Consider the IVP
Definition 2.4.1 Let
be an
eigenvalue of the
matrix A of
multiplicity .
Then for
,
any non-zero solution v of
Exercise 2.4.1: Let v1 be a non-zero
solution of
Lemma 2.4.1: Let A be a real
matrix with real eigenvalues
repeated according to their
multiplicity. Then there exist n generalized
eigenvectors
of
A, such that
is
nonsingular and A = S + N with
Proof: (omitted)
Remark:
J = P-1 AP is called the
Jordan canonical form of A.
Theorem 2.4.1: Let A be a real
matrix with real eigenvalues
repeated according to their
multiplicity. Then the IVP (2.5) has a unique solution
given by
Corollary 2.4.1: If
is a real
eigenvalue of multiplicity n of an
matrix A, then
Example 2.4.1: Solve the IVP (2.5) with
Solution: It is easy to solve
and find that A has an
eigenvalue
of multiplicity 4. Thus
S=I
In the general case, we must first determine a basis of generalized eigenvectors for Rn and compute and N = A - S.
Example 2.4.2: Solve the IVP (2.5) with
Solution: A has eigenvalues
,
.
It
is easy to find the corresponding eigenvectors
In case of multiple complex eigenvalues, we have the following Lemma whose proof can be found in Hirsch and Smale, Appendix III.
Lemma 2.4.2 Let A be
matrix with complex eigenvalues
and
,
,
repeated according to their multiplicity. Then there
exist 2m generalized eigenvectors
wj =
uj + ivj and
,
such that
is nonsingular and
Remark:
J = P-1 AP is called the
Jordan canonical form of A.
Theorem 2.4.2: Under the assumptions of Lemma
2.4.2, the IVP (2.5) has a solution
Example 2.4.3: Solve the IVP (2.5) with
Solution: A has eigenvalues
,
of multiplicity 2.
Solve (A-iI)w=0 and get the eigenvector
Solve
(A-iI) w = w1
to get the generalized eigenvector
In the general case, we have the following result. (Hirsch/Smale, P. 133)
Lemma 2.4.3 Let A be a real matrix
with real eigenvalues
,
and complex eigenvalues
,
,
,
repeated according to their
multiplicity, where k+2m=n. Then there exist
generalized eigenvectors
,
wk+1 = uk+1 + i vk+1,
,
,
such
that the matrix
Remark: The matrix
J = P-1 AP is
called the Jordan canonical form of A.
Theorem 2.4.3: Under the assumption of Lemma
2.4.3 the IVP (2.5) has a solution
Based upon the above theorem, we arrive at the following important conclusion.
Theorem 2.4.4: Each coordinate in the solution
x(t) of the IVP (2.5) is a linear combination of
functions of the form